Conclusions

Looking at the many problems with guidelines we ask, do we really need them at all? Why are there no guidelines for dentists, veterinarians, or lawyers? These professions have kept control of their destinies by rejecting direct third-party reimbursement, and all the strings that come attached with this. Ultimately, guidelines and P4P become means to bypass the doctor-patient relationship and centrally determine how medical care is delivered. They replace the art of medicine with paint-by-numbers. Guidelines are fatally flawed. They are more likely to do harm than good and should be rejected.

References

1 Winchester JF: Scottish medicine, Scottish physicians and the development of medicine in pre- and post-revolutionary America. Proc Am Clin Climatol Assoc 1994; 105:5461.

2 Amerling R: Practice guidelines: are they dead on arrival? Yes. Nephrol News Issues 2003;17:38-39.

3 Amerling R: Practice guidelines: do we really need them? Perit Dial Int 2005;25:140-141.

4 Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Hiroeh U, Roland M: Pay-for-performance programs in family practice in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 375-384.

5 Coyne DW: Pernicious anemia: influence of industry on renal guideline development. 2006, doi: 10.2215/CJN.02170606.

Blood Purif 2007;25:39-47 DOI: 10.1159/000096396

Published online: December 14, 2006

0 0

Post a comment